|
Sunday, 20 September 2009 19:04 |
|
As you already know, at the 2009 VMAs hip hop superstar Kanye West jumped on stage during the first award of the night to tell the world that 19 year old country music phenom Taylor Swift didn't deserve to win. A media sh*t storm has since ensued. Leaving publicists, PR experts and industry professionals to debate one topic: Can Kanye's career survive this?
It's a fair question. After all, West has jumped on stage uninvited before. He has interrupted awards, he has thrown backstage tantrums and even called racism when the awards didn't go his way. We have watched him stand up for the victims of Hurricane Katrina and melt down in a crying fit when another performer gets to perform at a better time slot. But this was different. When Kanye spoke out about George Bush, he looked rebellious. When he argued that he should have won an award, he looked overly passionate. When he interrupted a squeaky clean teenage girl's first major award (that he wasn't even nominated for), he looks like a bully.
His outburst was certainly rude, uncalled for and he should put it on his list of things to regret for the rest of his life. But, was it unforgivable? Can a man who has made such incredible music for nearly 10 years be blacklisted for a 30 second mistake? He didn't physically harm anyone. He didn't break any laws. But he did victimize a teenage girl on live television. He made himself look not only childish, but classless and mean. Is this new reputation something that can be repaired? If so, how? Will a hit record, tearful apology or trip to rehab wipe away the memory?
Fortunately for Kanye, he has a prime example of what not to do right in front of him: Chris Brown. Brown's handlers appear to be giving him the worst advice imaginable. On top of that, he hasn't released any good music to remind us of why we are supposed to love him since his arrest. Kanye on the other hand, is doing everything right. He apologized to Swift and to her mother then he went on live TV within 24 hours and offered another very sincere apology. Not only did he apologize, but moments later he stood next to Jay-Z and Rhianna and gave a great performance of a song that he produced. He reminded us that his unchecked passion can also create incredible music. There is only one major piece to the puzzle missing: Swift and West need to publicly bury the hatchet. Collaborating on a song together (for example) would not only create sales gold, it would make it tough for Swift's fans to scowl at West. It's hard to hate someone while you are dancing to their music.
So, can Kanye's career survive? The simple answer is yes. In fact, I would go as far as saying "OF COURSE!" After all, R. Kelly was "allegedly" seen committing rape on a video tape that was viewed by millions and he is still making hits. It takes time, but eventually this too shall pass. Kanye's road to perdition is no where near over and he will certainly lose a lot of support from what Sarah Palin calls "real America." But if he continues to make amends, he has a long career ahead of him.
Cheers,
-JM
|
|
|
Tuesday, 15 September 2009 03:50 |
|
Every so often an established brand decides that it's public image needs a new lease on life. That decision may be made in order to clean up a bad reputation, adapt to a new (more competitive) marketplace or simply as a method to be viewed as cutting edge. Whatever the reason, a full brand face-lift almost always starts with a new logo.
In 2009, two brands that have become fixtures in the Manselle household have decided to re-brand: supermegastore Wal-Mart (now spelled Walmart) and urban America's most legit fashion brand Sean John.

Let me be the first (of many) to say that I HATE the new Walmart logo. Well, hate is a bit strong. After all, I think the typeface is clean, modern and does it's job of softening the once rigid and corporate look of the logo. However, the star/sunburst/flower thing represents everything that is wrong with modern corporate logos. It's vague, devoid of character and looks like something one would find in a "Create Your Own Logo" kit from OfficeMax.

Sean John, on the other hand, may be on to something here. I hate to admit it since I was a big fan of the signature logo, but this (kind of) works for me. The spaced sans serif typeface is plain, but unique enough to be brandable. Sean John has always been a clothing line that gave off a luxurious kind of urban opulence. The clothes are more tailored and classy than Rocawear, but certainly more legitimately urban than Armani Exchange. I think this logo is good for now. But, I would like to see an accompanying icon (perhaps an SJ) in the near future.
Cheers,
-JM
|
|
Friday, 24 July 2009 22:05 |
|
At Manselle Media, a lot of logo design projects come across my desk. One of the things that I enjoy most about marketing, is watching the branding trends. Some have been great (web 2.0, the color green for all things earth friendly) and some not so great (the attempts to mimic Obama's change motifs).
One of my favorite recent trends has been the liberal use of bar codes in logo design. Of course, use of such a simple starting point will no doubt become tedious in the near future. But, as these below examples show, the results can still be quite impressive.


Cheers,
-JM
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 2 of 2 |